logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.12.17. 선고 2020누58429 판결
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Cases

2020Nu58429 Revocation of revocation of driver's license

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Defendant Elives

The Commissioner of the Local Police Agency

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2020Gudan8975 decided September 23, 2020

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 3, 2020

Imposition of Judgment

December 17, 2020

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's revocation of the driver's license (Class 1 large, class 2 common) against the plaintiff on February 6, 2020 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

This court's decision is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge or higher judge;

Judge Lee Young-young

Judges, white leaves

arrow