Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts added or changed as stated in paragraph (2) below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts to be determined additionally
A. On the 4th page of the first instance judgment, the part of the 35 and 36 (including each number) shall be added to the macroscopic evidence of No. 17, and the part of the 35 and 36 (including each number) shall be added following the last scopic of the same page.
In light of the contents of the instant contract, the nature of the transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the transaction progress and transaction details, etc., it is difficult to view that there is any error in the method and result of the inventory inspection in relation to the existence and amount of the said outstanding amount, which the Plaintiff had already verified and decided, on the grounds that the value of the goods supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff was uniformly applied to the Korea Ginseng Corporation’s supply price or factory price, and the Defendant’s profit or fee was entered in the transaction ledger, and that the inventory inspection was conducted without considering the discounted value or free supply amount for the exercise of sales promotion.
[Attachment]
B. The part Nos. 8, 17, 9, and 7 of the first instance judgment is replaced by the following part.
In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 13-1 through 47 and the whole arguments, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff supplied the products, such as red ginseng sources, entrusted by the defendant from September 1, 2009 to July 31, 2013, to I. However, in full view of the aforementioned evidence Eul evidence Nos. 23-1 to 3 and the purport of the whole arguments, I regard the above delivery.