The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the gist of the grounds for appeal is the confession and reflect of the defendant, the arrest of a large number of drug offenders by the defendant's active investigation cooperation, and the defendant does not repeat again, etc., the punishment (one hundred months of imprisonment and one hundred thousand won of collection) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is deemed to have been administered once more than 0.03g of the Meptamine, and the case is not less than that, in the past, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though there was the past record of having been punished several times as a crime of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (one-time imprisonment and two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment), and the crime related to narcotics is significant to have a significant risk of social harm and recidivism, and the lower court determined that the Defendant was sentenced to punishment by taking into account the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, and taking into account all such circumstances as the character, character and environment and the environment of the Defendant, the background and result of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.