The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the gist of the grounds for appeal, that the defendant cooperates in the investigation of a narcotics offender by the investigative agency, that the defendant's previous convictions before 2006, that the defendant supports two children, etc., it is unfair that the court below's sentence (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection 102,00 won) declared by the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes is considered as follows: (a) the Defendant smoked about 0.3g of marijuana on one occasion; (b) the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of the clopon (one copon); (c) the Defendant possessed approximately 1.17g of the copon; (d) the case is not easy to copon; (c) the crime related to narcotics is seriously harmful to society and the risk of recidivism; (d) the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment twice in the past; and (e) the Defendant has the history of having been sentenced to imprisonment twice for the same crime; and (e) the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant; (e) the background and consequence of each of the instant crimes; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the circumstances after the crime, etc., and thus, the Defendant’s allegation above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.