The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant and the victim B in the facts charged are C. C. The C.I.D. were divided into “E group” requiring the withdrawal of D pastors and “Emergency Countermeasure Committee” supporting D pastors, and they were disputing each other.

On July 7, 2012, the Defendant, as a new map of the “Emergency Countermeasure Committee”, committed multiple strings in need of treatment for about 10 days to the victim, with a view to having the arms and body of the victim, who is the part of the “E group” side of the said two forces, in the cridge parking lot located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence consistent with the above charged facts: ① the witness B’s legal statement, B’s accusation statement, B’s police statement, ② the video CD (36 pages), on-site photographs (12 pages), ③ the injury diagnosis statement (10 pages) and the damaged photograph (30 pages of investigation records).

However, even if the above evidence is based on the video CDs and field photographs, which are the most direct and objective evidence, of the evidence, the appearance of the criminal defendant's wheels B around July 7, 2012 is not clearly verified. In light of the above, the facts charged cannot be acknowledged by each of the above evidence, and in light of the above, it is difficult to recognize the facts charged by the investigation agency B and each of the statements in this court.

한편, 위 상해진단서와 피해사진은 B이 입은 상해의 정도에 관한 것일 뿐 피고인이 그와 같은 상해를 야기하였다는 점에 관한 한 아무런 실질적 정보가 없는 것인바, 오히려 위 상해진단서에는 상해의 원인으로 ‘외상성(당일 밤 10시경 교회에서 여러 명에 의하여 밀치고 할큄)’이라고 기재되어 있는바, 그 기재 자체에 의하더라도 B의 상해가 피고인의 행위에 의한 것인지 불명확하다.

It is insufficient to recognize the facts charged only with each of the above evidence.

There is no other evidence to prove the facts charged otherwise.

3. Conclusion, this case.