logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고합174
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates the E Reading Office in Jeonju-si Donsan-si D.

1. On May 13, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 13:50 on May 13, 2017, committed an indecent act against a juvenile victim, who was a juvenile victim, who was seated in the reading room and was going to the reading room at around 13:50 on May 13, 2017.

2. On May 13, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on May 13, 2017: (a) around May 21, 2017, at around 21:20, the Defendant divided the conversation with the Defendant in the reading room, and followed the victim who wishes to enter the reading room into the reading room, and was in charge of both arms and shoulders of the victim with his own hand, and committed an indecent act against the victim, who was a juvenile, following the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Stenographic records;

1. List of seizure and protocol of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (related to the explanation of the act expressed by the injured person in the situation of damage when recording the statement, the details of voluntary submission of CCTV image files in the course of the crime, the attachment of the seized CCTV images and video CDs, the attachment of a photograph by cutting down the scene of the crime, and the attachment of a photograph by cutting down the body of the injured person, and the verification of the CCTV screen in which the injured person shot out the body of

1. Photographss of a reading room, CCTV-faf course and photographs to take a photograph;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that the victim’s bucks were inside the bucks.

However, the following circumstances revealed by taking full account of each of the above evidence, namely, ① the victim made a concrete statement at the investigative agency to the effect that “the Defendant continued to put his her mbucks into the lower part of her mbucks (Evidence No. 21-22)” (Evidence No. 21-22), the appearance of the Defendant and the victim, which can be verified through the above video CD, do not conflict with the victim’s statement, and ② the victim merely makes a false statement that the Defendant was inside his muckbucks.

arrow