1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The defendant stated in the annexed list in the Land Tribunal.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant was established after obtaining authorization from the head of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 28, 2007, and the plaintiffs owned real estate as shown in the attached Form in the business area as the defendant's member.

(hereinafter referred to as "the real estate of this case". (b)

On May 31, 2007, the defendant issued an authorization to implement an urban environment improvement project (hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case"), and issued an announcement of the application for parcelling-out by setting the period for application for parcelling-out after receiving an approval of the management and disposal plan on May 30, 2008, and the plaintiffs filed an application for parcelling-out within the above

If it is thought that it is not necessary to apply for parcelling-out because it has already been applied for parcelling-out at the time of applying for parcelling-out (revision), it is always required to apply for parcelling-out (revision) because the members' balance and proportionality have been changed even with the thickness of the union members.

5. Estimated charges (2) The ratio of proportion to the sales price to be changed according to the decision of the general meeting of management and disposition is determined by the resolution of the general meeting of management and disposition, and the ratio of proportion to the sales price to be changed at 132.09% in the course of the negotiation of the city project shall be determined by the approval of the management and disposition plan, and the validity shall accrue with the approval of the management and disposition plan.

On May 31, 2013, the Defendant obtained authorization for the change of project implementation, and on November 20, 2013, designated the period for application for parcelling-out as from November 21, 2013 to December 21, 2013 and publicly announced the application for parcelling-out as follows:

1) An association member who has not filed an application for parcelling-out during the alteration period of the application for parcelling-out shall maintain the existing application for parcelling-out, but the thickness of the association members intending to modify the application for parcelling-out shall be submitted to the Association in writing during the period of the application for parcelling-out.

3) The withdrawal order of the standard application for parcelling-out shall be submitted to the Association in writing during the period of the application for parcelling-out. If the parcelling-out price is scheduled, the proportional rate shall be as follows: