1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s reconstruction improvement project 1) On January 23, 2008, the Plaintiff changed the size to 32,002.5 square meters ( October 32, 2008, Oct. 32, 2008, and hereinafter “instant project area”).

) The head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the "head of Eunpyeong-gu") shall implement the reconstruction improvement project.

(2) On May 28, 2009, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of the association from the head of Eunpyeong-gu to obtain authorization for the implementation of the project on May 28, 2009, and publicly announced the application for parcelling-out by setting the period for the application for parcelling-out as of January 13, 2010 (hereinafter “first parcelling-out”); and (2) on July 14, 201, the head of Pyeongtaek-gu has obtained authorization for the implementation of the project in order to increase the number of households instead of reducing the number of households; and on August 4, 2011, publicly announced the application for parcelling-out by setting the period for parcelling-out as of September 5, 201 (hereinafter “second-party parcelling-out”); and (3) on March 7, 2013, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the implementation of the project to be converted into a small-type household, and publicly announced on March 23, 2013 by extending the period of application for parcelling-out by the head of Bupyeong-gu.

(hereinafter referred to as “third-party sale”). (b)

1) Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as indicated in the business process surrounding the instant real estate

(2) D is the owner who completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant real estate on June 14, 2002 and agreed to the establishment of the Plaintiff and applied for parcelling-out in response to the first sale and the second sale, but did not apply for parcelling-out within the third sale period.

C. On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff, one of the Plaintiff’s related lawsuits against D, is listed in attached Table 1 among the instant real estate.