logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.10.20 2016가합10051
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. As to KRW 120,325,830 among Plaintiff A and KRW 10,938,708 among them, the amount of KRW 120,325,830 from July 28, 2015 to KRW 36,00.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties concerned are the cooperatives that were designated as implementers under the Urban Development Act from the port market for the purpose of establishing the owners of the land in the north-gu Eri-gu, Fri-ri, and Gri-ri, and implementing urban development projects in the relevant area. The plaintiffs are the persons who owned the land in the urban development zone of the defendant.

B. The Plaintiff Company A owned 305 square meters (the administrative district was changed to 3055 square meters prior to Posi-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, on November 30, 2015) prior to Mapo-si, Mapo-si, on March 16, 1981, sold the land to Mapo-si, Incorporated Co., Ltd. on November 27, 2012 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day. 2) Plaintiff B owned 1374 square meters in JJ-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and sold it to K on January 13, 199, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 24, 2014.

3) Plaintiff C owns from March 16, 1979 the area of 459 square meters (the size is changed to 1028 square meters as a result of the division, merger, and the last division, October 23, 2014) in Northern-gu L 459 square meters (the size is changed to 1028 square meters as a result of the division, etc.) in the port of port, and on April 9, 2014, Plaintiff C sold 1653/4509 shares of the above land to M, and sold 1828/4509 shares to N, respectively, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the 30th of the same month (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”).

C. The Defendant’s reclamation work commences civil construction work within the project zone from April 2012, and executed reclamation work on each of the instant land before the Plaintiffs sold the instant land (hereinafter “instant reclamation work”).

(A) On April 26, 201, prior to the instant banking operations, the designation of a planned land substitution under Article 35 of the Urban Development Act was not made even though a topographical map was publicly announced on a city development project implementation plan and an urban management plan (district district unit planning drawings) was publicly announced on April 26, 201.

On July 2015, the head of the tax office in charge of taxation taxation against the plaintiffs shall pay transfer income tax, additional tax, and local income tax to the plaintiffs, respectively.

arrow