beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal and additional determination as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
【The part of the judgment of the court of first instance】 The part of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the plaintiff 2 and 6 “the plaintiff” shall be deemed to be “the business entity operated by the plaintiff and the selector C,” and the plaintiff 9 and 10 shall be deemed to be “the plaintiff and the selector C” respectively.
2. The defendant asserts that the amount of damage is KRW 8,01,00,000 which was actually paid out of KRW 10,501,00 for the construction contract, but in calculating the amount of damage, the defendant's claim for the construction work against the defendant's customer is established due to the defendant's tort regardless of whether the defendant actually paid the construction work, and the defendant also asserts that labor expenses, food expenses, and beverages are omitted from the total amount of cost of videophones to be installed at each construction site. However, considering the purport of the argument in the evidence No. 15, the defendant's assertion that the total amount of cost of the construction site where the contract was concluded with the plaintiff and the selected company's customer information from D can be acknowledged as the ground for 4,815,651 (the defendant submitted an investigation report only on the actual condition of construction business's wage, and the defendant did not submit all the above materials with respect to the fact that the defendant actually paid labor expenses, etc. to the communications engineer or paid labor expenses to the plaintiff and the selected company).
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.