logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.22 2019나57022
소유권보존등기 말소 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any additional determination as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(2) In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff’s claim for the return of unjust enrichment from February 1, 2013 to the land owner of the instant case is justifiable in light of the above legal principles. (3) The Plaintiff’s claim for the return of unjust enrichment from February 1, 2013 to January 27, 2007 by prescription acquisition of the instant land is as seen earlier, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for this part of the Plaintiff’s claim on a different premise is without merit.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow