Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 28, 2014, around 18:15, Defendant A was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business by a police officer H, etc., who was called out after receiving a report of disturbance on the ground that he was not paid the construction cost at the Ferc shop in the Ferc box operated in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and moved to a G box located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul.

At around 20:05 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the instant G police box, on the grounds that the instant H tried to take over the Defendant’s personal illness to the Seoul Eastdong Police Station, and (b) expressed that the instant H “I must do so, which would be seen as “I must do so,” and “I must do so, bit bit B, bit B, bit B, bit B, bit B, bit B, bit B, son B, and son B, by hand, assaulted twice the chest part of other police officers who control the Defendant’s personal illness as her head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes.

2. The Defendant: (a) committed a conflict with the police officer, and (b) committed an assault by the police officer, i.e., the Defendant 2, at the above temporary police box; (c) by reporting the body of the police officer, who was affiliated with the G police box, and (d) smuggling the shoulder of the saidJ; and (c) sealed the body of other police officers who control the said A by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to H and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV crimes and CCTV video CDs;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendants of suspended sentence: The defendants of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, despite their past records of having been punished several times due to obstruction of performance of official duties, violence, etc., leading to the crime of this case. However, the defendants confession and reflect, and the circumstances after the crime of this case were committed.