logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.5.10. 선고 2019도3060 판결
업무방해
Cases

2019Do3060 Interference with business

Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm sound, Attorney Jeong-chul, and Park Gyeong-jin

Judgment of remand

Supreme Court Decision 2015Do12094 Decided July 24, 2018

The judgment below

Gwangju High Court Decision 2018No318 Decided January 31, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

May 10, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal). Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending

In addition, the argument that the lower court erred in violation of the principle of no punishment without prison labor and the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act constitutes an allegation of unfair sentencing. However, under Article 383 Subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed. In this case where the lower court rendered a more minor sentence against the Defendant, the argument that the amount of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Cho Jong-hee

Justices Kim Jae-in

Justices Min Il-young in charge

Justices Lee Jae-hwan

arrow