Cases
2019Do3060 Interference with business
Defendant
A
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Law Firm sound, Attorney Jeong-chul, and Park Gyeong-jin
Judgment of remand
Supreme Court Decision 2015Do12094 Decided July 24, 2018
The judgment below
Gwangju High Court Decision 2018No318 Decided January 31, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
May 10, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal). Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending
In addition, the argument that the lower court erred in violation of the principle of no punishment without prison labor and the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act constitutes an allegation of unfair sentencing. However, under Article 383 Subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed. In this case where the lower court rendered a more minor sentence against the Defendant, the argument that the amount of the
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Judges
Justices Cho Jong-hee
Justices Kim Jae-in
Justices Min Il-young in charge
Justices Lee Jae-hwan