1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for this Court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, and the reasons for this Court's explanation are as follows, and the reasons for this Court's explanation is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the rejection of the entry of Eul evidence No. 2, which is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion as evidence that is additionally submitted in the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as

2. Parts in height:

(a) the second instance court's ruling "E" in the 15th, 18th, and 2nd, shall be understood as "A";

B. Defendant is obligated to pay to Plaintiff A 6.96 million won, Plaintiff C 3.64 million won, Plaintiff D 6.6 billion won a year from April 2, 2015 to September 30, 2015, 200% a year under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% a year from the next day to the day of full payment (Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sept. 25, 2015) and Article 2(2) of the Addenda of the same Act, which exceeds the rate of 15% a year after September 25, 2015).

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff (Appointed)'s claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is partially unfair, but the judgment of the court of first instance cannot be modified disadvantageous to the defendant in this case which only the defendant appealed. Thus, only the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.