The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the D coffee specialty store located in Busan, Busan, on September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (b) and (c) received text messages from the injured party; and (d) had sexual harassment on the ground that E was committed by assaulting the injured party’s head at the victim’s hand, frighting, frighting, and frighting the victim’s chest with one kne, etc.; (b) had the victim’s hand fright to assault the victim; and (c) had the victim’s hand fright to assault the victim’s victim’s head at a canter so that E may assault the victim; and (d) even after coffee, E had the victim’s head frighted with both knick, led E to the victim’s pressure against the victim’s loss by booming the victim’s hand.

As above, when the above E puts the victim with approximately three weeks of medical treatment, the Defendant 1 was able to facilitate the commission of the crime, and thereby, prevented the victim from committing the crime.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged.

A. The F argues that “the Defendant was removed from his hand.” However, the Defendant appears to have removed F with his left hand, and the Defendant appears to have left hand, and the Defendant was to have decided E with his hand.

Considering the fact that F was in the situation where F was assaulted by E at the time, and that F was in the position of F, it was difficult to see the Defendant’s behavior properly, and it is reasonable to see that the Defendant’s behavior expressed in CCTV images was removed from E and F.

(b) G is the same as in the initial statement that the defendant tried to see two females, and the same shall not apply to a statement;

was stated.

Since then, after checking CCTVs as the F, the accused is closed.