logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.07.21 2015고단556
위증
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2013, the Defendant served to the port of port in a gamball amusement park located in the south-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-

C Any bus that has been seated on the back of the bus

D was on the front side of himself

There was a fact that E has been a large interest in E and E has been witnessing to speak F by moving to the back of the bus.

The facts charged in this part of the original indictment are as follows:

D It was forced by F to commit an indecent act against F and was in the front of his play.

There was a witness to remove F from D by moving E to the back-side of the bus by moving E with a large interest of E. F.

“.....”

However, according to the following evidence, D is subject to forced indecent act from F and E in a large amount, and E is deemed to have been removed from F, but it is not sufficient to recognize that even if the following evidence and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor are included, D was removed from D in the situation where D was forced indecent act from F, and F was removed from D in the situation where E was forced indecent act.

However, the part of the facts charged is based on facts other than the facts in question where there is a false statement as to which the defendant made a false statement as to a certain fact, and as seen below, the court held that the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as to the facts in question where the defendant's testimony is false. As such, the court held that the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as to the facts in question where the defendant's testimony is false, and without the procedures for modification of the indictment, recognized the premise facts within the scope recognized by each of the following evidence (see Supreme Court Decision 86Do866, Nov. 11, 1986; 2001Do2832, Aug. 24, 2001, etc.). Thus, the defendant is at the court of the Daegu District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch at around 14:40, Apr. 14, 2015, which was 181 as the court of North Korea at the time of the amendment of the indictment:

arrow