1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 894,288,641 against the Plaintiff and its related amount from May 11, 2017 to June 24, 2020.

1. The reasoning of this part of the judgment of the court is as stated in Paragraph (1) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of Paragraph (1) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited pursuant to the main sentence of

2. The 2nd 14th 14th son was the Defendant “the Defendant” to the Plaintiff.

3. The following shall be added to the 10th page below:

"8.Period 2) An inspection of occupants after sale shall be conducted three times before and after the completion inspection, and shall be corrected immediately when a request for supplementation is made.

6) On the basis of six hours working hours of the earth and sand works, and on the basis of mutual agreement at the time of extension of eight hours work, the amount shall be settled in accordance with mutual agreement. (The Defendant shall be calculated by adding “the Plaintiff” to “the Plaintiff”, under three pages of the three pages “(36,00,000 cubic metres/30,000 in cubic metres of six hours work, metres/30,000 in daily normal work hours).

8 under the 4th bottom "(d) was approved for the use of the Jeju market on March 31, 2017 for the building of this case, and on April 10, 2017, the registration of ownership preservation has been completed in the future of the defendant."

4 Up to 6-7 pages for recognition (under 6-7) “Evidence A1 through 3” shall be read as “Evidence A 1 through 3 and Evidence B 16”, and “Appraiser” shall be read as “an appraiser of the first instance trial.”

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court concerning the plaintiff's cause of action is as stated in Paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

3. The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept the reasoning of the judgment in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

6 At the bottom of 6, the term "E (E)" shall be put into "AV (State)".

At the bottom of 6, 2 parallels “17,424,500 won” shall be filled up to “20,355,000 won”, and each note shall be deleted.

7 The 7th 10th 10th Sheet line construction shall be called the roof line and ...