(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2012.06.13 2011고단3820

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2012.06.13 2011고단3820

무고

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On September 29, 2010, the Defendant, who runs the printing business in the name of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building Non-dong 114, was promised to become a joint and several surety at the victim F’s request on September 29, 2010, to be a deposit amount of KRW 450,000,000 for recycled goods sales contract, and examined a sales contract for recycled goods produced by the debtor F and creditors G, and then, despite the Defendant’s signature and seal on the joint and several surety column, G set up a provisional seizure of claims on the Defendant E’s building upon the expiration of the payment period of some of the above deposit amount, and was willing to file a complaint different from the fact.

After stating that the defendant is the complainant A and the defendant F, the defendant stated that "A was the complainant, and the complainant was the signature for sample in the column of joint and several sureties of the contract with the last 10,000,000,000,0000,0000 won," the defendant made a false statement that "A, for the purpose of exercising the F, made a contract with the forgery of private documents by adding the above three contracts to the joint and several sureties, and the complainant prepared a sales contract for recycled goods between F and G as a joint and several sureties of the above contract amounting to KRW 450,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won." On July 27, 2011, the defendant submitted the above complaint to

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to the police station for the purpose of having the victim FF punished criminal punishment.

2. (1) The primary evidence on the fact that the above accusation by the Defendant is false is the document stating F and G’s statement and its statement.

However, in this court, the witness F and G made all different statements on the date of preparation, details of preparation, method of preparation, etc. of the above "sales contract".

Therefore, F and G cannot easily believe that the statement is made by F and G, and also cannot be trusted in writing in which the statement is written.

(2) Of the above sales contract, the above “recycling goods sales contract”.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2013.02.21 2012노897

-서울남부지방법원 2015.09.16 2015고정1357

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.12.15 2017고단1114

-의정부지방법원 2016.09.26 2015고단3376

-광주지방법원 2018.04.25 2017고단2893