logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.08.20 2014가합25617
토지인도
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The instant road site was partitioned on December 5, 1987, and its land category was changed from orchard to road. As to this, each registration of ownership transfer in the Plaintiff Man-do Construction’s name was completed in order due to sale on June 21, 2013, for the reason of corporate merger as of February 17, 1988, the title of the Co., Ltd., which was based on the partition of co-owned property as of February 19, 198 (hereinafter “Seman Unemployment”), the name of the Plaintiff Yucheon Petroleum as of June 12, 2013, and each registration of ownership transfer was completed in order.

B. On Aug. 7, 1987, Seogun obtained a construction permit with respect to the construction of 5 Seocho apartment units, which are an aggregate building of 1236, 1238 ground-based, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, 1236, 1238 ground-based, adjacent to the site of the road of this case (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). At that time, on July 16, 1988, the construction was approved on July 16, 198. The road of this case among the road sites of this case, the road of this case was constructed on the part inside the ship connecting each point in sequence.

C. On August 5, 1986, the Defendant determined that each of the urban planning facilities of the following categories were included in the following categories: (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (4) as to the part on the part on the part on the part on the road connected with each of the points in the order of priority among the road sites of this case, and on March 21, 1997: (1), (2), (3), (4), (9), and (3) as to the part on the road connected with each of the points in the order of priority, but did not implement it.

In the underground of the road site of this case, a sewerage system built by a rain unemployment is installed, and a water supply system is not installed.

[Reasons for Recognition] In without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 through 3, Eul evidence 4-1, 2, Eul evidence 6-1, 2, Eul evidence 6-2, Eul's water supply service headquarters of the Cheongju City, and the fact-finding results of each fact-finding with respect to the corresponding Gu of Cheongju City, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion is the road of this case.

arrow