1. The Defendant’s KRW 93,557,747 as well as 6% per annum from April 30, 2016 to October 12, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff is a corporation operating a special lecture wholesale retail business, etc., and the defendant is an individual entrepreneur operating the business establishment, and upon request from the defendant, the plaintiff supplied special lectures and processed it to the defendant from the end of April 2016, and at the request of the defendant, the plaintiff did not receive KRW 93,557,747 out of the price. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff 93,557,747 of the price of the remaining goods and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Commercial Act from April 30, 2016 to October 12, 2016, on the record that the delivery date of the copy of the complaint in this case is the delivery date of the copy of the complaint in this case, and 6% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. As to the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant argued to the purport that since the defendant has received a provisional seizure decision from other companies and the majority of civil lawsuits are faced with the crisis of bankruptcy due to legal disputes, such as the pending cases, such circumstances may be considered. However, such argument alone cannot be rejected or rejected by the plaintiff's claim of this case. Thus, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

(3) If the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating parties. (3) The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.