A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is operating a danran bar with the trade name “D” in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

No person shall drink alcoholic beverages with customers, provide entertainment services to customers, or request other persons to provide such services at a place where food service business is operated for profit.

Nevertheless, the defendant from 20:00 on January 8, 2012 to the same month.

9. From the day to the day of 00:50 to the day of 00, 30,000 won per hour from E who was found as a guest at the above D shop, and had the person with no name paid for entertainment expenses, and had the person with no name paid for entertainment expenses, such as drinking and singing together with the above E, and arranged for entertainment as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, E, and G;

1. On-site photographs, copies of books, and joint copies;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 98 of the Food Sanitation Act and Articles 98 and 44 (3) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the suspended sentence);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's assertion of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing the cost of lawsuit was merely a son with the son who had not arranged for entertainment reception workers at the time of the instant case, and had been playing with the son who had been negligent E.

According to each of the above evidence, E consistently stated that “The defendant arranged entertainment workers for 3,4 hours and played together for 50,000 won per 50,000 won per annum.” Due to the drinking value, the police attempted to end the case, and the police officer’s statement also corresponds to this, and the defendant again asked E to make a statement that she would drink with her son’s and her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s interrogation protocol).”