logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.02.17 2015고정798
노동조합및노동관계조정법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a group leader of C 2 Group Department Co., Ltd. who acts on behalf of the business owner on matters relating to workers.

No employer shall control or intervene in the organization or operation of a trade union by any worker.

Nevertheless, on January 28, 2014, the Defendant may be at a disadvantage from the company if he/she joins a trade union on the ground that D, who is an employee of the above department, was in a state of temporary retirement for one year due to disease, due to the fact that D, who was aware that D, who was an employee of the above department, joined the trade union;

At the same time, D's attempt to use D's words to join or withdraw from a trade union.

On the same day, the Defendant called D around 12:48 on the same day, and “Legally unfavorable if it is, and the company gives her any other things than the law.

We need to respond within the law even in the company. Accordingly, we need to consider how much the company might be legally disadvantageous to the widthed test. I think it would be the same as the company's decision to grant a consent to the extension of the inside, if there was a labor union, regardless of the company's standard. It would be the same as the company's decision to grant a consent to the extension of the inside, if there was a labor union in accordance with the law.

It is difficult to find out how and how much we know with the four fora, and how we can see how much we can and well. NA is a labor union member.

In this sense, it stated, “I know that I will do so thoroughly and legally,” and “I inform the cooperative of the contents of the broadcast call, the cooperative, and of how I would have responded to the Co-ownership of the Co-ownership of the Co-owned Sea. N. D.”

Accordingly, the defendant uses D's employees of the affiliated department that they should not join or withdraw from a trade union, and the activities of the trade union through D.

arrow