logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.08.22 2017고정835
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is a related person in the victim B (51 years of age, inn) and who is known to the general public, and the victim is a person who operates a restaurant with C and D.

1. On March 20, 2017, the Defendant found drunk to C in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on March 20, 2017, and did not have the intention of selling e-mail and e-mail to the victim B;

Does the interest have been paid;

It shall be called as “as soon as possible sending,” and Si expenses shall be borne by the neighboring merchants, and there shall be no interest that shall be paid for only one year with a loan of only three months to this woman.

It was difficult to talk about the fact that it was not " and to avoid disturbance at the victim's shop."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's 40 minutes by force.

2. The Defendant returned home with the police officer who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, but returned home on March 20, 201, the Defendant returned to the police officer on March 20, 201, but returned back to the place of port No. 10:00 on March 20, 2017, and opened a warning board, seated with tobacco, and obstructed the Defendant’s smoking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

3. On March 20, 2017, the Defendant returned home with the police officer called up upon receipt of a re-report; however, on March 20, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to the D cafeteria located on the first floor of the Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F shop, and if the Defendant wishes to give money properly to brucing, drinking, and internal food supply;

The expression "I would receive money for the female test" was made, and it was difficult to avoid disturbance by continuously taking a desire without having the victim go to her even though the victim did so.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the victim of about 40 minutes by force.

4. The Defendant returned to the police officer upon receipt of another report, but returned to the Defendant, on March 20, 2017, at around 13:00 on March 20, 201, and on March 3, 201, “The Defendant and the Victim” sent to the Defendant.

given that there is a change in internal liquor;

Forp, how much pain may be occur.

Monaments.

arrow