logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2019.09.04 2019고합29
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A special injury: (a) around 22:00 on April 28, 2019, the Defendant: (b) was living together with the victim B (the age of 51) for about seven months; and (c) had a fluoral disease, which is a dangerous object on his/her table, with drinking alcohol together with the victim; and (d) had a fluoral disease, which is a dangerous object on his/her table, she collected about two and three occasions; and (e) had a fluoral column where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), listened to the statement of damage against B by four persons, such as F, etc., from the position of the Si/Eup/Myeon Police Station E District Unit, who was dispatched after receiving the report of 112, and asked the Defendant’s personal information, thereby refusing to answer the statement, and intending to go to the living room of the victim, and the F, thereby keeping the F’s body sealed by hand, and resisting the Defendant’s breath, and breathing the Defendant into the E Zone on 22:18 of the same day, and breathing the Defendant into the flagrant offender at around 22:18 of the same day, and interfering with the legitimate execution of the duty of the police officer assigned to the front-hand left-hand side of the F, one time by hand, and one time by hand interfering with the police officer assigned to the front-hand side of the F.

3. The Defendant injured by the obstruction of special performance of official duties was arrested as a flagrant offender as described in Paragraph 2, and tried to leave out of the office while taking a bath, and he prevented him from doing so. At this point, he saw that he was working outside of the office, and he she saw him as “picker .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ... .........” The Defendant expressed his desire to her slope G as follows: around 23:02 on the same day on the cell phone, which is a dangerous object against his hand, interfere with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties related to the handling of reported cases, investigation into flagrant offenders, etc.; and, on the same day, he she

arrow