logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2018.06.07 2017허8121
거절결정(상)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Application number 1) / filing date of the instant registered trademark 1: (a) the designated goods consisting of coconsent components of Chapter 0-20-17130/17130/ March 9, 2015: 3) the designated goods classified by the category of the goods: Bady, including coconsent components of Chapter 03; Bady for human body, mazines, mazines, lazines, beauty dypines, cosmetics, hair-cream, hacker-consing date, hackerers, hair-to-crows for cremation, hair-to-crow for cremation, skine-to-pine for cremation, skine-to-medical use, bathing, bathing, distribution, handcos, cosmetics (tax 4) the applicant: the Plaintiff

(b) 1A registered trademark) registration number/registration date/registration date/registration date: 59639/39/37 of the trademark registration: 17.17/1979/19. 9b) designated goods: c) the number of pages, enjoyment, alkine, libsium, eyebrow, mastro, white part, water delivery, general compost, sclock, scam, scam, pent new, chreshing new, clishing, creshing, creshing, creshing, creshing, creshing, creshing, creshing, greshing, creshing, hair, madine, gresh, shresh, gal, shresh, galivine, galivine, hurine, hurine-2/9 of the Intervenor Melel.

C. 1) On August 19, 2016, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office regarding the Plaintiff’s application for the registration of the applied trademark of this case: (a) on the ground that “the trademark of this case is similar to the prior registered trademark, and the designated goods of the applied trademark of this case are identical or similar to the designated goods of the prior registered trademark,” the former Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 14033, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter the same applies).

Article 7 (1) 7.

arrow