Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving B car car. On July 22, 2003, around 23:57, the Defendant: (a) transferred the two-day intersection of the death of the North-gu drive in the north-gu at the port from the surface of the rooftop street to the surface of the square, the Defendant: (b) on the part of the victim's driver's driving car, who caused the injury to the injured party, such as the 2 weeks of the death of the north-gu at the port to the surface of the square; (c) on the part of the front part of the driver's driving car at the front part of the front part of the driver's driving car; and (d) on the part of the front part of the driver's driving car at the port; and (d) on the part of the driver's driving car at the port, the Defendant did not interfere with the operation of the 912 and 3912 of the ice repair and operation without any damage to the 91.

2. According to Article 3 of the Addenda to the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8730 of Dec. 21, 2007), and Article 249(2) of the former Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8730 of Dec. 21, 2007), the indictment of this case was instituted on August 27, 2003, and it is apparent that the statute of limitations has expired when 15 years have passed since the public prosecution was instituted without a final and conclusive judgment. According to the records, the prosecution of this case was instituted on August 27, 2003, and it is apparent that 15 years have passed without a final and conclusive judgment.

Thus, the public prosecution of this case constitutes the completion of the statute of limitations, and thus, the public prosecution of this case is acquitted against the defendant pursuant to Article 326 subparagraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act.