logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.06.18 2014고단2566
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months, Defendant B was punished by a fine of 10,00,000 won, Defendant C was punished by imprisonment of 3 years, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over a cash card or a passbook attached with his/her belt (a password necessary for the use of a cash card and a user number registered with a financial institution or an electronic financial institution), or establish a pledge, lend or take over such means of access in return for consideration, or arrange the lending of or taking over such means of access, or arrange the lending thereof;

Nevertheless,

A. A around April 2012, Defendant A received each passbook, password, cash card, and security card from the bank account in the name of G, and from the new bank account (I).

B. From April 2013, Defendant C1) received the passbook, password, and cash card from the J’s National Bank Account (K) account under the J’s name. 2) around April 29, 2013, Defendant C1 received from “M”, which was known from “M” L in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, to the effect that “the head of the Tong is necessary to make a transaction, is not informed about whether the head of the Tong is safe, and only the head of the Tong is created,” and transferred the passbook, cash card to B.

C. On April 29, 2013, Defendant B acquired the passbook, password, and cash card from C from a national bank account under the J’s name, as indicated in the preceding paragraph.

2. Violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant A’s co-principal committed a crime are persons operating the chemical board with the trade name of “M” in Gyeyang-gu L, Yangyang-gu. Defendant D received monthly pay of KRW 1500,000 per month from Defendant C, and managed the above M’s Internet shopping mall, while posting a photograph of fireworks products on the Internet shopping mall “M”, “style”, etc. to publicize fireworks products or to approve the settlement of accounts, and Defendant A was aware of the introduction of B with Defendant C.

Defendant

A around October 2012, 2012, the card number, validity period, and Defendant C.

arrow