A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2016. 7. 1. 01:00 경부터 같은 날 01:30 경까지 인천 남구 C에 있는 피해자 D가 경영하는 ‘E’ 식당에서 술에 취하여 아무런 이유 없이 식사 중인 손님들에게 다가가 “ 야 이 씹쌔끼들아, 너희들 택시기사들이지 그런데 술 쳐 먹고 운전해도 되냐.

The spits or spits, etc. spited in a large spit, which interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same date, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), received 112 reports at the site, and recommended that G in the situation of the F District 2 Team of the Incheon Southern Police Station Police Station 2 of the Incheon Southern Police Station that called the site go out of the place to restrain the Defendant who gets disturbed in the restaurant. The taxi officers who drink the drinking to stop only the Defendant, and carried out the tobacco that he was under way on the floor and carried out the fright of the above G face several times.

계속하여 피고인은 순찰차로 이동하는 위 G을 따라가 " 야 이 씨 발 놈 아. 너 입 꽉 깨물어, 너는 좀 맞아야 돼 씨 발 놈아!", " 이리 와 이 씹쌔끼야 너 한대 까고 한 번 가보자 이 개새끼야!" 등 욕설을 하면서 위 G이 입고 있던 조끼를 잡아당겨 뜯어 버리고, 왼손으로 멱살을 잡은 후 주먹으로 위 G의 우측 눈 부위를 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, G, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act lies in the police officer’s view.