Defendant

A shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment, and the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 566"

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant is an internal director of the FM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) in the Dong-gu Etel 1907 in Gwangju-gu, and the above F was registered as a representative director G, director A, and auditor H.

The board of directors determines the convocation of a general meeting of shareholders, and a company of less than one billion won may make a written notice to shareholders or hold a general meeting of shareholders with consent of all shareholders at least ten days before the general meeting of shareholders. However, there was no legitimate decision of the board of directors on the convocation of a general meeting of shareholders or legitimate notification procedure

Nevertheless, around June 10, 2015, the Defendant held a general meeting of F corporation organized by lawful procedures at the meeting room of the second floor of the 153-6 Gwangju Northernbuk-gu, Seoul, the second floor of the meeting room of the 2nd floor of the 153-6 Gwangjubuk-gu, and submitted documents related to the Defendant's former K, the Defendant's birth L, the Defendant's birth L, the above K's personal seal impression, the seal stamp, the resident registration certificate, and the resident registration certificate to change the corporate officer to the above person, and submitted the above B B, who was aware of the fact, filed an application for the registration of change of executive officer in relation to the change of the F's name in the registration office of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City District Court located in the Dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the registration office of the 16:00 on June 23, 2015, thereby making it impossible to know the name of the executive officer of the corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the same official electronic record as corporate register.

B. At that time, the Defendant had the foregoing Gwangju District Court registry office keep and exercise a public electronic record identical to the corporate register in which false facts were recorded.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant forged private documents at the end of May 2015.