1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,00 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from January 1, 2019 to May 29, 2019, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff, upon the introduction of the Defendant, who is a real estate consulting business entity, purchased the land 1514 square meters in the Yancheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do prior to the subdivision. The Plaintiff, via the Defendant, divided the said land before subdivision into 397 square meters, 453 square meters in the Yancheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and 453 square meters in the E field, changed the category and category of land into 183 square meters, and newly constructed 2 bonds, thereby selling D land and a newly built house on the ground.

B. On March 4, 2015, the Plaintiff, upon the Defendant’s introduction, purchased F-U.S. F-U. 2202 square meters prior to the subdivision, and completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on April 13, 2015, the Cheongju District Court (Cheongcheon District Court 5662), which received on April 13, 2015, and completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on March 4, 2015. On October 5, 2015, the said land before subdivision was divided into F-U.F. 72 square meters, G-U. 72 square meters, and H-U. 758 square meters.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) C without distinguishing the land before and after the said division.

On April 29, 2015, the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant KRW 7.5 million, KRW 5 million on June 6, 2015, and KRW 17.5 million on July 24, 2015.

The Defendant: (a) executed construction on the lower side of the instant land by spreading the soil above the lower side; (b) did not perform the construction work for building sites other than that, and (c) the instant land was left unattended for several years without building sites.

[Basis] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 8 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, and Eul evidence Nos. 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments No. 3

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff purchased the instant land by obtaining a loan of KRW 200 million from the Defendant, upon recommendation from the Defendant to the effect that the Plaintiff was able to establish a house for electric source or develop it as a site for electric source.

After July 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant created a site for electric power supply, such as stockpiling stone to the instant land and linking a stone with a drainage pipe.