beta
Text
1. The crime set forth in Article 2 of the Judgment and Decision No. 1 as to Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and the crime set forth in Article 1 as to Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On November 28, 2007, the Busan District Court rendered a suspended sentence of 2 years on December 6, 2007, for the crime of violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (obscenity) in the Busan District Court's branch branch, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months.
1. Defendant A, at the call center of a telephone financial fraud organization located in China, conspired with Defendant B to withdraw the money acquired through the cash withdrawal of the so-called “Singing” organization of the so-called “Singing” organization, under the pretext of the terms and conditions of the telephone call at random, and under the pretext of the loan commission, and to transfer money from the call account at the call center of the telephone financial fraud organization located in China, through the KTX special transmission, etc., and to withdraw the amount of money acquired through fraud, and transfer the withdrawn money to the Bosing organization located in China. Defendant A conspired Defendant B to withdraw the cash with Defendant B with the consent of Defendant B to transfer it to the Singing organization of China.
Around February 15, 2013, when the victim F's cell phone Kakaoxooox sent text messages to the victim F's cell phone Kakaox, which was false, the victim transferred KRW 100,000 to G's community credit cooperatives account in the name of G from the victim. The Defendants withdrawn the above money under the direction of the member of the Chinese Bophishing organization.
Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with the non-name telephone financial fraud aid staff, received KRW 9,44,800 from February 15, 2013 through 313 times from February 19, 2013 to September 19 of the same month in collusion with the above method, by means of the name of the cost, the name of the loan fee, etc. for the remainder of the conditions.
(2) On February 17, 2003, where the telephone financial fraud organization member cannot know the location around February 17, 2003.