Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 26, 2012, at around 18:10 on September 26, 2012, the Defendant, like B and C, performed the victim G(54 years of age) and the bath in which B performed mixed alcohol in F operated by the victim E in Pyeongtaek-si D market.

Accordingly, the Defendant collected three main soldiers from the victim G, and laid the chair, and C her back the back part of the victim with the hand floor, and C her went to the victim G again, and her walked up over the floor by putting the shoulder part of the victim G her hand over 3 times with the victim G her hand, which she went to the victim G again coming to the victim G, and the Defendant her walked with the victim's face part four times by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with B and C, suffered bodily injury, such as internal equipment, internal organs, and tissues, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment in order to encourage the victim G, and interfered with the victim EF operation by exercising power.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect C or B of the police;

1. Statement of police statement related to G and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing body photographs;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 2 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is three times the previous case of the Defendant’s fine, the Defendant did not take any measure such as having agreed with the victim G or E or compensating for the damage, the Defendant also submitted a written diagnosis by asserting that he suffered bodily injury, but it is difficult to find reasons for reduction than the punishment prescribed in the summary order, taking into account the following: (a) it is difficult to find out the reason for the recognition of causal relationship with this case after the lapse of 20 days after the occurrence of