logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.10 2015고단2615
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person, not an attorney-at-law, who receives or promises to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits or who provides or promises to provide such things to a third party, shall not handle or arrange legal services, such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, etc. concerning general legal cases.

Defendant

A is a person who is working as G and professor at the Daegu Science University of Daegu-ro 47, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro, and Defendant B is a person who is working as an agent for soliciting investment in the same attached securities while operating the I in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and Defendant C is a person who operates Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and is not an attorney-at-law.

Defendant

A On April 2015, 2015, the representative N of M(ju) who is a L Group Cooperation Company, was audited of the fact that “the L Group’s ethical management team supplied false materials to O, thereby suspending supply to L Group, and thereby filing a complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office as to the above facts in the L Group. The L Group requested N to the effect that “I would be able to prevent the prosecution from filing a complaint in response to the senior position of the L Group, and help the resumption of delivery suspended,” and the N would be connected with executive officers such as the vice president of L Group.” The L Group said that “I would know how I would prevent the prosecution from filing a complaint and resume the supply suspended by requesting the executive officers such as the vice president of the L Group.”

After that, on April 2015, Defendant A conspired with Defendant B, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant B, Defendant C’s executive officers of L Group, prevented them from filing a criminal complaint regarding false delivery cases, and Defendant B, in the order of solicitation to request L Group to resume delivery.

In addition, around April 8, 2015, Defendant A’s general sense of “ Qu” in Daegu Suwon-gu P.

arrow