logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.10 2015고단3295
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall accept or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits or provide or promise to provide such things to a third party, in compensation for providing or arranging legal services, such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, etc. with respect to cases under investigation handled by an investigative agency.

Nevertheless, Defendant B, who is under investigation due to the suspicion of opening a gambling house in the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, conspiredd with Defendant B to commit a crime in order, such as her flicklying a police officer who knows to Defendant A to resolve her flickly, after receiving a request from Defendant B, who is under investigation due to the suspicion of opening a gambling house in the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, and demanding Defendant A to do so through a police officer around the area.

Defendant

A around December 31, 2013, from the back of the G company located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, to end up the case of the above E’s gambling opening in the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station as above, and through Defendant B, he received cash of KRW 15 million from the above E. On the same day, the mother of Defendant A transferred KRW 15 million to the corporate bank account in the name of H, and Defendant B received KRW 30 million from the above E-type I to the corporate bank account in the name of B.

As a result, the Defendants, not attorneys-at-law, received 60 million won through three times under the pretext of soliciting or arranging an investigation case in an investigative agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s statement in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the second protocol of trial;

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a investigative report (verification of H account), certificate of deposit, certificate of account transfer, bank account under H’s name, data on details of remittance, and statement of account transactions;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow