A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2015, at around 01:30 on October 21, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the victim D was seated in front of the general restaurant “C” in B, and displayed the wall on which the check is in the form of a check, while drinking, and thought that the Defendant stolen the wall.

The defendant who has caused the victim to be set up and sustained by the victim;

A 100,000 won check and a 1,200,000 won check were stolen by cutting off the wall containing a total of KRW 1,20,000,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Details of issuance by real name number in front of himself/herself, copies of recovered 100,00 won check, and application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the relevant criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] for the larceny of general property (general larceny) (no person who has any special sentencing factors)

2. The execution of a sentence shall be suspended by taking into consideration the circumstances, such as a relatively minor extent of damage caused by the decision of a sentence; a person has been convicted of the same kind of crime but has not yet been punished for about twenty years; and a person who reflects