logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.01.09 2014가합5147
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. 45,500,000 won and November 1, 2014

Reasons

1. On September 4, 201, the Plaintiff indicated in the separate list (hereinafter “each of the instant real property”) to the Defendant: (a) leased deposit amounting to KRW 80,00,000; (b) KRW 8,000,000 per month; and (c) from May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2015; (b) each of the instant lease agreements was leased to the Defendant; (c) on the grounds that the Defendant’s rent of KRW 1,50,000 for May 1, 2014; and (d) from June 1, 2014 to October 10, 2014 to KRW 44,00,000 ( KRW 8,80,000,000 x 5 months); and (d) the Plaintiff did not pay each of the instant real property at the rate of KRW 45,500,000,000, 400,000.

2. The part dismissing part of the Plaintiff sought the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from October 16, 2014. However, the portion of the Plaintiff’s claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from October 16, 2014 to October 31, 2014 is included in KRW 45,50,000 in the amount of the rent in arrears ordering a separate payment order. As such, only the portion of the claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from November 1, 2014 is accepted.

3. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow