1. Defendant DI’s imprisonment in two years and six months, Defendant DJ’s imprisonment in one year and six months, Defendant DK’s imprisonment in eight months, and Defendant DL.

Criminal facts

Defendant

DI was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months on July 25, 2013 by the Daegu District Court for the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 17, 2014.

Defendant

DJ, on October 29, 2009, sentenced the Daegu District Court to three years and six months of imprisonment for fraud assistance, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence at the Kimcheon Juvenile Reformatory on October 22, 2012.

Defendant

DL was sentenced by the Daegu District Court on April 7, 2010 to a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the first prison of North Korea, North Korea on December 28, 2012.

[2013 Highest 5536] Defendant DI, Defendant DJ, along with Defendant DK, recruited elderlys throughout the country to be accommodated in the entrances located in the East Zone, and managed them, and obtained the identification card, resident registration certificate, abstract, passbook, head of passbook, physical card, security card, Internet banking ID, password, etc. in his name in return for providing accommodation, and then searched a corporation which was not closed on the website of the Small and Medium Business Administration or on the website of the Small and Medium Business Administration and did not receive telephone, and then did not receive telephone from the office, the office certificate of the elderly, employment certificate of the above corporation, withholding of wage and salary income, and the detailed statement of withdrawal of withdrawal money stating the details of payment payment, submitted it to the lending company, and the loan company received loan confirmation from the lending company through the phone number of the above corporation through the transition of call call in advance, and deposited it in the name of the lending company as if Defendant DK obtained a false loan from the lending company.

Defendant

DM, Defendant DN, and Defendant DO, who wanted to obtain a low interest rate loan, called that they should first receive a high interest rate loan and pay it to the victims to use the borrowed money.