logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.12.23 2014고정1223
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 19, 2013, at around 13:40 on May 19, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) placed “D” 'D' 'D' operated by the victim C, which is operated by the victim C, b; (b) placed the victim a b0-minute disturbance in a luscing manner; and (c) caused the above victim to go through a luscing manner; and (d) prevented the said victim from receiving the customer, thereby interfering with the business of selling the said victim’

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 5. 19. 14:15경 광먕시 E에 있는 광명경찰서 F파출소에서 위 1항과 같이 업무를 방해한 것으로 인하여 현행범인으로 체포되어 경찰서로 인계되기 위해 대기하다가 위 F파출소 소속 경사 G의 복부를 발로 걷어차 경찰관의 파출소 질서유지 및 현행범 인계 등에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on photographing Damage, such as a investigative report (No. 6), a screen screen of video images;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow