(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단4223

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단4223

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 4223"

1. Around December 28, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime of fraud against the victim C does not have any kind of relationship with the Gice, the president of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and he does not have any kind of relationship with the Gice, and he does not have any substance to be appointed as H. The Defendant is a person of a processed product without any substance, and the Defendant did not have any ability to allow the victim C to supply food materials, such as seed to the F.C., without any capacity to have the victim C deliver it, even though he did not have any capacity to do so, the Defendant would not have a kind of relationship with the Gice of the President of the Republic of Korea, and that he will have H, upon the completion of his predecessor’s transfer and acquisition, use the rice to use it for the first 20 billion won, and supply it to H to the extent that he will continue to use it for the first 4 billion won and to use it for the rice.

On December 26, 2009, the Defendant received 5 million won from C for the purpose of supply brokerage expenses, and acquired 225,750,000 won in total over 26 times from around that time to January 31, 201, as shown in the attached crime sight table (1).

2. Crimes of fraud to the Council of Victims, fabrication of private documents, or uttering of private documents;

A. On June 2013, the defrauded stated that “The Defendant, at K coffee shop located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, the fact is not the Fambling Audit Team leader, but the victimJ did not have any fambling relationship with the Fambling President, and even though there was no entirely the ability to allow the victimJ to supply rice to L, the Defendant would allow the J to supply rice to L. Expenses are necessary for the supply contract, and the Lbambs must pay transportation expenses.”

The Defendant, from J on August 6, 2013, belongs to the Defendant.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.12.05 2014고단649

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.01.18 2011고단886

-서울서부지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단2328

-인천지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단1630

-광주지방법원 2014.01.21 2013고정2482