The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is only an unilaterally assaulted by the victim E, and there is not an injury, such as breathing and pushing, etc. of the victim.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged of this case.

2. The judgment of the court below revealed the following circumstances revealed by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., (1) victim E, at the court of the court of the court below, that "at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant saw his flab and flab attached to the defendant at the workplace at the factory of D Co., Ltd. at the time of the crime of this case, and then, at the passage adjacent to the workplace, the defendant saw his flab, and the defendant flabed his flab, etc., and the defendant flabdddd with the defendant's flab with the wind that the defendant flabddd with the steel products in his flabed with him." The statement was specific and consistent from the investigative agency; (2) N at the scene at the time of the crime

testimony to support the above statement of the victim, ③ was at the scene of the crime of this case

M, F, L did not see that at the time of the crime of this case, the Defendant was able to see the blicking and smuggling of the victim at the time of the crime of this case. However, according to the photograph taken immediately after the crime of this case, it is confirmed that the victim’s blicking and blicking is red and blicking in the shape blicking on the shoulder with the victim, etc., and the Defendant did not have persuasive explanation of the situation where the above blicking was caused to the victim. ⑤ The victim was issued a certificate of injury that the victim was blicking and blicking the victim’s blicking and the blicking blicking blicking blicking blicking blicking blicking blicking blick blick blick blurg