logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고단6506
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant had been sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 12, 2015, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the same court on June 25, 2015, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment at the Jung Eup prison on July 5, 2016.

【Criminal facts】 around September 28, 2016, the Defendant, at around 23:55, obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by threat by force on the grounds that the victim D (n, 34 years of age) did not sell alcoholic beverages at the “C” restaurant located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant, who spawns another customer to walk for a trial cost, made a large amount of voice, and spawned the other customers, and thereby interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

"2017 Highest 619"

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On December 19, 2016, around 13:10 on December 13:10, 2016, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at a “G” restaurant operated by the Victim F (V, 54 years of age) in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, provided a bath while drinking with the victim, and was on the table.

For about 10 minutes, such as putting pots, the disturbance was uneasyed for customers who are in the restaurant.

B. On January 8, 2017, the Defendant is drunk at the “J” restaurant operated by the victim I located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on January 8, 2017, and the Defendant did so to the said K as an employee of the K, and the Defendant did not hold any day off on the part of the Plaintiff.

The Doctrine read “,” and the Doctrine for 30 minutes to other customers, such as raising a disturbance to the restaurant, thereby uneasying customers in the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the restaurant business of victims by force.

2. Although the Defendant caused negligence should not put things, etc. to prevent harm to other customers who are taking meals at the same time and place as stated in paragraph 1(a), the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the above F to put him to the head of the victim L (the age of 79) by putting him/her a gate.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.

arrow