Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2012, around 23:30 on August 26, 2012, in front of the first floor management office of the Seo-gu Daejeon District Office, the Defendant: (a) refused access of the Defendant and his/her behavior, E, and F, who was the president of the Seo-gu Daejeon District Association, to interfere with the management office while blocking the management office; and (b) assault the victim’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of the video CD reproduction;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act because the Defendant’s act was inevitable for the victim to enter the management room in front of the management room, which is its business territory.

Comprehensively taking account of the above evidence, it is difficult to recognize the fact that the defendant committed an assault against the victim as stated in the facts constituting an offense, and it is difficult to recognize that the defendant satisfied the requirements for legitimate acts such as reasonableness of the method, etc. even in a case where he exercises the physical force against another person like the defendant. Thus, the above argument by the