The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misunderstanding of legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant did not have engaged in the removal of boomed with the banner as of the date of the occurrence of the instant fire.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the Defendant is an employee in charge of the maintenance and repair of banner at the Incheon Metropolitan City Facilities Management Corporation; around 09:09 on May 13, 2013, the occurrence of a fire in the second floor banner management room at the Incheon D Civil Defense Education Office where the Defendant was working; ② the person who entered the banner management room at the time of the occurrence of the fire was in possession of the Defendant’s fee G, and the rental company’s staff at the time of the occurrence of the fire, but the Defendant was not in charge of the maintenance and repair of banner at the time of carrying the banner at around 08:54, and the Defendant was not in charge of the management of the banner at around 90:0 on the day when he was removed from the police room at around 90:00 on the day when he was in charge of the fire.