beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On May 8, 207, the method of paying the name of the contractor/insured product (monthly) insurance premium for the total payment month/payment period of the insurance premium of 10,000 won on the premise No. Serial No. Serial No. Serial No. 1 of the securities contract, and automatic transfer on July 3, 209, A: (D) A: A Special Agreement on Lifelong Planning and Design 2 of the Special Agreement on July 3, 209: On July 1, 209: 1 type No. 9,558,000 won on the (paid No. 222,00 won on the payment period) 5/10 (payment period of 6 months);
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant conclude each of the instant insurance contracts as follows:
B. With respect to the instant insurance contract, around May 8, 2007, the insurance premium was paid by automatic transfer from the Plaintiff’s Bank Account (D; hereinafter “Korea Bank Account”), and with respect to the instant insurance contract, KRW 9,780,000 on July 6, 2009, KRW 9,585,000 on January 25, 2010, KRW 9,585,000 on July 26, 201, and KRW 9,585,00 on January 25, 201, KRW 9,585,000 on January 25, 201, and KRW 9,585,00 on July 25, 201, total of KRW 58,120,00 on KRW 9,585,00 on July 25, 201.
C. The instant insurance contract terminated on or around June 27, 2007, and KRW 9,599,968 was refunded to the Plaintiff’s bank account as a refund for the maintenance contract. The insurance contract was terminated on or around February 27, 2012 and the Plaintiff’s agricultural bank account (E) was refunded in KRW 26,559,000.
The Plaintiff and the Defendant, including each of the instant insurance contracts, concluded 33 insurance contracts from August 29, 200 to July 28, 201, through F, an insurance solicitor belonging to the Defendant, including the instant insurance contracts, as indicated in the List of Insurance Contracts (hereinafter “the List”), and all of them terminated.
E. The Plaintiff’s 33 insurance contracts at issue with the Defendant, which are not the Plaintiff, via a dispute mediation around July 2012. As to the 16 insurance contracts that are not the Plaintiff from among the 33 insurance contracts at issue with the Defendant, the Plaintiff accepted the Plaintiff’s assertion and paid-in premiums by the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff, who was the insured and the person with parental authority, failed to sign the Plaintiff’s own signature at the time of applying for the insurance