logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.25 2017가단221901
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(c)based on the criteria and the amount exceeding 9.4 billion won shall be the service costs;

2) Method of payment: 50% of the service cost on the date of the real estate sales contract and 50% of the balance date without payment or intermediate payment. The plaintiff and the defendant may terminate this contract after mutual consultation if there is gross negligence on the part of the parties to the contract on the grounds of termination of the contract. However, when the plaintiff requests the termination of the contract on the grounds of termination of the contract, the defendant and the defendant must pay the service cost through mutual consultation. Article 7 (Mutual Confidentiality and Prohibition of Multiple Services) 2) The plaintiff and the defendant shall not perform any act, such as a contract and agreement, with the third party in relation to the relevant business site after the conclusion of this contract, and shall not be subject to civil and criminal liability

Article 8 (Effect and Termination of Contract) The validity of this contract shall take effect immediately by signing or sealing the trade name, and the termination shall take effect in principle on the date of conclusion of the contract for real estate transactions subject to consulting services.

* The plaintiff shall, in principle, consent to all acts related to the sale and purchase of real estate (advertisement, publicity, rental contract, etc.) and the defendant shall report to the plaintiff.

C. Under the Plaintiff’s consent, the Defendant had two employees, etc. to carry out the instant service contract stay in the building E, and sent a reply to the Plaintiff’s employee requesting the delivery of the office around April 8, 2017, to arrange the said office by no later than 12 days on the day.

On the other hand, the Defendant, at his own expense, posted an advertisement on April 8, 2017, on the newspaper page "2.4.3% of the actual investment rate, 8.3% of the sales rate, 11.5 billion won of the loan, 6.0 billion won/monthly rent of 6.00 billion won/monthly rent of 35 billion won, housing price of the house (20 million households)".

E. On September 13, 2017, the Plaintiff sold the instant building in KRW 9 billion through a licensed real estate agent F.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 8, 11.

arrow