A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one month.

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the PC room in which it is difficult to identify the trade name at the time of Sinpo-si, posted a letter to sell 600,000 won an strong English teaching material by accessing the Internet server and selling it to the national website, and then, made a false statement to the victim CW who contacted with the Defendant, stating that “If deposit is made in 60,000 won, it will send strong English teaching material.”

However, even though the defendant did not possess goods at the time, he or she made a false statement because he or she required to charge cyber money for illegal sports discussions or use money for personal living expenses, but did not have the intent or ability to sell the goods from the beginning.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 600,000 won through the NongHyup Bank account (Account Number I) in H on the same day from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A CW statement;

1. Kakao Stockholm course-faging outputs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing deposit verification;

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, the reasons for sentencing of punishment [the scope of recommendation] [the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment] No person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to January 1, 6] [the decision of sentencing] [the person subject to special sentencing] did not pay damages, and the fact that the person again committed the instant crime after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of the same kind in 2016, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a crime of the same kind in 2016, was found to be erroneous, and the fact that the person again committed the instant crime is against his or her will be recognized, and the defendant's age has yet to be considered as favorable, and the defendant's age has been taken into account, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and several methods, were committed against many victims, and the judgment of this case was pending in the appellate court.