beta
Text
The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is from June 5, 2018 to May 31, 2019, with respect to KRW 10,000,000 and its amount.
Reasons
1. Basic facts common to the principal lawsuit and counterclaim;
A. On January 24, 2018, the Plaintiff is a company that merges C with a company that combines C with the purpose of a web exhibition business (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is a company that engages in development, consultation, sale, lease, maintenance and repair business of software for the purpose of development, consultation, sale, maintenance and repair business of software.
B. On March 15, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) ordered the Defendant to improve the Eart Culture Center System (hereinafter “D”); (b) provided that “Planning/Design/Bing” portion of the “Planning/Design/Bing” among the “Eart Cultural Center Advancement Project” (hereinafter “instant sophistication Project”); and (c) determined the contract amount of KRW 127 million from March 15, 2017 to July 31, 2017 during the basic contract period.
(hereinafter “instant contract”). C.
The advancement project of this case is a business that is operated by Eart from November 30, 2017 in various systems, such as the content of education, instructors, hours, and application for taking lectures, etc. of the cultural center site operated by Eart, and is divided into “frt-end” portion used by consumers (hereinafter “frt portion”) and “bbak-end” portion used by the manager (hereinafter “bag-end portion”). The Defendant entered into a direct contract with D with D and was in charge of the overall PM business (hereinafter “PM business”), while the Defendant entered into a direct contract with D to take charge of the development of the entire Prm part and the white part. The Plaintiff was not directly entered into a contract with D, but was partially funded by the Defendant.
However, around July 8, 2017, D, the owner of the instant upgrade project, expressed complaints about the progress of the business until then, requested F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) to the effect that it was providing consulting services on the Defendant’s PM affairs on behalf of the Defendant and end up the said upgrade project.
D The background that F made the above request to F is that F establishes a system of the Eart Culture Center site.