logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.10.24 2019구합122
지적재조사에따른부과금처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s process of the cadastral resurvey project is 1,160 square meters in Nam-si, Nam-si (hereinafter “instant site”).

2) The instant forest land and C forest adjacent thereto (hereinafter “instant forest”) and the instant land and the instant land are “each of the instant land.”

(2) On February 24, 2017, the Governor of Jeollabuk-do designated and publicly announced the size of 192,305 square meters for the cadastral resurvey project (the Defendant; hereinafter “instant project”) in the E area, including each of the instant land, pursuant to Article 7 of the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey (hereinafter “Cadastral”) as a project district for the cadastral resurvey project in the Southern-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

(F) Notice of Jeollabuk-do.

On January 29, 2018, the Defendant, as a result of the cadastral resurvey survey on the instant site, notified the Plaintiff of the cadastral confirmation scheduled statement that the boundary of the instant site (attached Form 1) is identical with the land to the land to be confirmed, and that the area of the instant site increases from 1,160 square meters to 1,277.8 square meters, the area of the instant site was increased from 1,277.8 square meters, and notified the Plaintiff of the opinion as shipment within 10 days. However, as the boundary between the instant site and the instant forest changes, the area of 109 square meters among the increased area of the instant site was incorporated into the instant forest (hereinafter “instant land acquisition area”).

(2) The Plaintiff presented an opinion on other land owned by the Plaintiff within the submission period of the opinion on the notification of the aforementioned cadastral confirmation protocol, but did not present any opinion on the instant site.

3. After the lapse of the above opinion, the defendant submitted to the Southern City Boundary Determination Committee the determination of the boundary of the land within the project districts of the project of the project of this case including the site of this case.

On March 7, 2018, the Committee deliberated and resolved on a boundary decision, and among the contents of the resolution, the instant site is included.

arrow