The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2013, the Defendant was unable to recognize the boundary of the site by breaking the market price of the victim E, who was established in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu D site, adjacent to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu D site, the Defendant owned by the Defendant, and by installing a fence with a height of about 60 cm and about 3 m in length, which is the victim’s above D site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each cadastral surveying record, cadastral surveying record, photographic counsel installed the fence as stated in the above facts of crime, but the above fence was installed along with the existing boundary between the Defendant and the victim, which is owned by the Defendant, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the boundary between the above sites was impossible to recognize due to the installation of the Defendant’s wall. However, according to the above evidence, the Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation conducted a cadastral survey at the victim’s request on April 2013, and as a result, it confirmed that part of the building on the above C site, which is owned by the Defendant, was invaded with the above D site, and indicated that it was possible to recognize that the boundary between the Defendant and the victim was installed at the victim’s request, and thus, the Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation again conducted a cadastral survey at around October 2013, and it cannot be deemed that the aforementioned survey was conducted with the perception that the boundary between the two sites was identical to that of the Defendant and the victim at the time of the survey on April 2013.

Therefore, it is true.