1. Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s appeal against Defendant DD, Defendant DD’s appeal, Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) C.

After remanding, the Plaintiff filed a suit with the principal claim against Defendant DD (hereinafter “Defendant DD”) to verify the absence of the duty to compensate for the “outboard”; Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) filed a claim for the payment of KRW 73,661,665 for this facility; KRW 318,890,00 for expenses incurred in restoring mountainous district; and damages incurred therefrom; and each of the “outboard” as stated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 2, as to the registration of lease establishment as described in Paragraph (2) of the attached Table 2; and the “outboard site” described in Paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1, as to the registration of creation of superficies as described in Paragraph (2) of the aforesaid Table; Defendant C Co., Ltd.’s claim for the payment of unjust enrichment against Defendant D Co., Ltd.; Defendant C Co., Ltd.’s claim for the payment of unjust enrichment against Defendant D Co., Ltd.’s existing ownership of the leased site; Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of unjust enrichment.

The Plaintiff appealed on the claim for the creation of superficies, which is the part against the Plaintiff, and the Defendants appealed on each part against the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim, and the judgment prior to the remand is partly subject to the Defendants’ appeal.